Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elena Pridankina vs Su Jeong Jang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pridankina vs Jang analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Elena Pridankina vs Su Jeong Jang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pridankina 0 - 1 Jang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pridankina has won 48.14% of points on their second serve, while Jang has won 45.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pridankina, in recent form, has won 59.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jang has won 52.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.13% and 43.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pridankina has saved 53.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jang has saved 46.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pridankina has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 55/ 22), with Jang winning 58.82% (W/L 30/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pridankina has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 22/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 30/ 12). Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 74/ 36), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Pridankina has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.44% of matches (W/L 50/ 22), where as Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pridankina winning 0 times and Jang being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pridankina winning 0 and Jang winning 2. The last match between Pridankina and Jang was at the W75 Doksy - Stare Splavy, 27-06-2024, Second, Clay with Su Jeong Jang getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pridankina and Jang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pridankina winning 0 times and Jang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pridankina winning 0, and Jang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pridankina has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.9 while Jang has played against players with an average rank of 241.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pridankina has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jang has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pridankina has converted 46.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jang has converted 49.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
267
Rank
266
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
232
Rank
114
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
73% (107-40)
Career Total W/L
60% (424-283)
69% (22-10)
YTD W/L
67% (20-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$340,345
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Elena Pridankina vs Su Jeong Jang For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Pridankina VS Jang
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Pridankina VS Jang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Elena Pridankina | Su Jeong Jang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:0 | 1:39:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (36/64) | 66% (38/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 44% (16/36) | 68% (26/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (13/28) | 45% (9/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (6/12) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (23/58) | 55% (35/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Pridankina VS Jang H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats 
Elena Pridankina
Player
Su Jeong Jang
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
|||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Elena Pridankina
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elena Pridankina | Su Jeong Jang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (22/10) | 66% (19/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (48/25) | 65% (42/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (367/281) | 56% (337/264) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 53% (8/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 86% (6/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (12/3) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 37 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:39 | 1:40:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 322.72 | 275 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1336/2037) | 69% (1195/1729) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (849/1336) | 63% (748/1195) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (337/700) | 46% (244/534) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (143/308) | 49% (121/246) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1034/2166) | 47% (864/1854) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (22/10) | 63% (15/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (21/31) | 66% (19/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (23/20) | 100% (16/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (23/3) | 0% (16/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 23% (13/3) |
Elena Pridankina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Elena Pridankina
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Elena Pridankina
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noma Akugue Noha
Player
Elena Pridankina
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Elena Pridankina
76%
(
73 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Amina Anshba
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Emily Appleton
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Elena Pridankina
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
114)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
12
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
114)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Anastasiya Poplavska
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
52%
(
27 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Elena Pridankina
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Su Jeong Jang
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Julie Pastikova
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Panna Udvardy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Su Jeong Jang
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Pridankina Vs Jang Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Pridankina are available here and Jang photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Su Jeong Jang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
